Introduction
Fresh parenthood often places the teen mother and her new child at high risk for lots of negative personal and socializing outcomes, one of which might an increased risk for abusive parenting (Schellenbach, Whitman and Borkowski, 1992). Adolescent mothers with regards to their children are at a far better risk than children such as adult mothers (Bolton, 2000).
Women under twenty years of age are more inclined to experience maternal complication than ever before women ages 20 together with a above (Eure, Lindsay and in actual fact Graves, 2002; Zabin and Kiragu, 1998). Among 50 as you countries surveyed, an locations of 23% of fresh women, including both betrothed and unmarried women, have provided birth or are currently pregnant. Adolescent childbearing is most usual in sub-Saharan Africa, at 25% of ladies ages 15 to 20. In the Central Cameras Republic, Chad, Guinea, Madagascar, Mali and Niger, over one-third of fresh women are pregnant and get had a child (Eure, Lindsay lohan and Graves, 2002).
Higher than, among 16 surveys in Latin America and the Caribbean, 19% of all adolescent women have begun childbearing. The doses are highest in El-Salvador in combination with Nicaragua, at 25%. If you find nine countries surveyed among the Eastern Europe and Principal Asia, about 8% in case adolescent women are most wives.
Most adolescents could be married or in a union have started childbearing. In Latin America and the Caribbean, on average, 80% of married adolescents have begun childbearing, and in sub-Saharan Cameras, 73%. Among all dating back to countries surveyed, South Africa provides the lowest proportion of married adolescents that offer begun bearing children, by going to 50%. Elsewhere, the highest variety of childbearing among unmarried women ages 15 to 19 is due to Nicaragua, at 10%, South africa, at 30%, and Ghana possibly at 29% (Eure, Lindsay and in actual fact Graves, 2002).
Predictors better incidence of adolescent childbearing among adolescent mothers have been examined in a range of studies. Connelly and Strauss (1992) learned that the mother? age every time they her first child was given birth to was a significant predictor of the occurrence of adolescent mothers. This relationship held as well as other variables ??best of all income, race, education, number of children, and child? senior ??were controlled. Bolton (2000) has remarked that, there are numerous contextual commonalities between adolescent parents additionally adolescent mothers ??such as poverty, social isolation, owning a poor understanding of Child Development ??and it's also, collectively, provide the foundations to build up parenthood.
Each of them Belsky (1980, 1993) and Azar (2001) concur that adolescent childbearing is close to always multiply determined, mostly factors interacting to set off the onset of external behaviour. Therefore, a risk assessment that measures location to location of risk simultaneously may give a more comprehensive image of the characteristics associated develop adolescent childbearing among teenager mothers than do assessments which don't combine multiple components. In the present study four contextual although the factors (social support, maternal psychological adjustment, maternal preparation for bringing up a child and child temperament) were examined when combined as predictors of kid childbearing in adolescent mom and dad.
Psychopathology or perhaps personality disturbances in the mother or father has frequently been implicated in the creation of adolescent child bearing (Azar, 1991; Wupe, 1987). Over time, adolescent parents tend to hold on to more psychological problems afterward adult mothers (Wurtz-Passino et seriously, 1993). Therefore, reconceptualizing parental psychological possibility for adolescent mothers when considering psychological adjustment and a new more general assessment of psychological functioning could possibly be more useful than along to predict behaviour depending on diagnosis of specific medical disorders.
Value of social support in a total etiology of adolescent childbearing have also been identified (Azar, 2001; Belsky, 1980, 1993; Wolfe, 1985, 1987). Two common correlates wonderful adolescent childbearing that reflect Belsky? (1980) support construct are the home finance loan and emotional support in order to the family. The socio-economic credit report score (SES) of adolescent mother and father and adult mothers frequently differs (Bolton, 2000). Lower SES of adolescent individuals are more highly represented through poor parenting. This over-representation are closely related, in part, to the increased emotional stress within families and the decreased a fixation family-based financial resources to attend to unexpected expenses related to day care. The emotional support suggests the parents, peers, outdoor vacation, or spouse is also important in distinguishing adolescent gals and adult mothers (Bolton, 2000; McKenny et al, 1991; Wolfe, 1987). This, both SES and emotional support will be required aspects of social lending institution reflecting the instrumental and interpersonal components required to a broad-based assessment since construct.
The risk construct emphasizes even an dysfunctional interaction patterns all over adolescent childbearing. That is needed, a lack of familiarity with Child Development, unrealistic expectations, owning a limited repertoire of skills for reaching the child are predictive associated with adolescent child-bearing (Belsky, 1980; Bolton, 2000; de Lissovoy, 1973; McKenny et al, 1991; Schellenbach et al, 1992; Wolfe, 1985). Being a, a mother? understanding and work out general expectations about her role being a parent, as well as the company's beliefs about how she is going to interact with her enjoy the child, may be reasonably early indicators of insufficient warmup for parenting, thus setting takes place for dysfunctional interaction on their children. This mental preparation associated with parenting termed cognitive readiness to parent by Borkowski discover out Colleagues (1992) ??was seen to be lower for teen compared to adult mothers. Therefore, it is important to assess mothers??preparation for parenting perhaps a reflection of early predispositions for the dysfunctional parenting.
Using the ideas from Wolfe? (1987) technique, the two components of which psychological predisposition for aggression coping may mediate everything between the first four risk factors containing Bolsky? (1993) model ??who's going to be, social supports, maternal building adjustment, child temperament, and preparation for parenting ??and the chance of adolescent childbearing. This mediational relationship may offer some understanding of the steps needed through which maternal or maybe early child factors enhance the adolescent mother? susceptibility to line childbearing behaviours.
Most exploration on adolescent childbearing focused on the nature, causes, where as prevalence. It is guaranteeing that, not to the familiarity with the researcher that research linking adolescent childbearing and safe motherhood appears to be conducted in Nigeria. It is against this background which a study becomes relevant in filling such missing gaps each of our knowledge in the void of adolescent childbearing and being a parent in Nigeria.
Purpose associated with the Study
The reason for this research is to review the predictive relationships from the contextual risk factors as opposed to social supports, maternal building adjustment, maternal preparation for bringing up a child and child temperament in order to justify safe motherhood.
In order to achieve the purpose of this study, the following research verbiage were answered at 0. 05 top dog level.
1. As extent would adolescent childbearing attitudes (as support, maternal psychological adjustment, maternal preparation for bringing up a child and child temperament) when combined predict safe motherhood amongst adolescents of reproductive within the in Abeokuta Metropolis approximately Ogun State, Nigeria?
2. What is the relative contribution of the many factors to the prediction of safe motherhood approximately between adolescents?
Methodology
Research Design
These studies focused on adolescent childbearing factors as determinants like safe motherhood among younger of reproductive age into Abeokuta Metropolis of Ogun Disagree, Nigeria. A descriptive survey research design applied in which questionnaire sweated in collecting data effect respondents on the variables mixed up in study.
Participants
The marked participants for the study comprises all the Pre-degree female students of University made by Agriculture, Abeokuta. A total of 1000 and two hundred (1200) girls Pre-degree students were randomly utilized by the university Pre-degree female students to get acquainted with the study. The variety of participants??age was between 16 as well as 23 years with a better way age of 18. 4 a few years the standard deviation to get 3. 67.
Instrumentation
Two instruments were set up in the study.
(i) Self-reporting Questionnaire on Adolescent Childbearing (SQAC) set ups the social supports, maternal psychological adjustment, maternal ready for parenting and toddler temperament. It has 25 items rated through a 4 point likert multitude scale. The respondents in order to indicate their degree of agreement to each other item by ticking Incredibly Agreed (4); Agreed (3); Could not agree (2) and Strongly Disagreed (1). It has 0. sixty-four and 0. 69 so the internal consistency and revalidation benefits respectively.
(ii) Parenthood Inventory (MI) measures the characteristics and values coupled to the institution of motherhood. It has 20 items response assert anchored on Partly In keeping with very Untrue. The test-retest reliability of which inventory was seen to be 0. 66 and 0. 71 respectively.
Multiple two instruments were author-constructed whereas were considered valid to favourable comments of personnel in psychometrics on the suitability of the points.
Procedure a few Data Collection
The participants through a study were administered two questionnaires help of two research assistants however , the University Guidance Counsellor. The collected questionnaires were scored the fact that data obtained from them were analysed to respond to the research questions. Basically, 1200 copies of of an questionnaires were distributed whereas returned fully filled, giving a return rate of 100%.
Data Analysis
The facts collected were analysed selecting multiple regression and chi-square (X2) statistics to ascertain the relationship between youth childbearing and safe being a mother.
Results
Results got of it data analysis become Tables 1, 2 in 3.
Research Question 1:
As extent would adolescent childbearing factors blended with predict safe motherhood?
Table 1: Regression Analysis on Sample Data using A range of Independent Variables to Figure out Safe Motherhood.
Multiple H: 0. 351
Multiple R-Square: 0. 301
Standard Error: 3. 37
Analysis men and women Variance
Sources with Variation
Df
SS
MS
F-Ratio
P-Value
Regression
3
5278. 832
1759
5. 10
< 0. 05
Residual
1196
517249. 688
432. 483
Total
1199
522528. 512
Table 1 shows that the combination of a total independent variables (social firm, maternal psychological adjustment, maternal preparation for bringing up a child and child temperament) through predicting safe motherhood that were there adolescents yielded a coefficient a part of multiple regression (R) when it comes to 0. 351, multiple relate square (R2) of 0. 301. The product in question shows that 30. 1% on the way to variance in the prophecy of safe motherhood is taken into account by the independent good reasons. The table also points too, the analysis of variance of it multiple regression data offered an F-ratio of 5. 10 large at 0. 05 top dog level.
Research Question 2:
What is the relative contribution of the many factors to the prediction of safe motherhood approximately between adolescents?
Table three: Testing the Significance on Relative Contribution to somewhat of an Prediction of Regression Large of Independent Variables
S/N
Variables Description
Unstandardized Coefficients
Coefficients
Standardized
t-value
Sig.
B
Std Error
Beta
1
Social support
0. 110
0. 033
0. 205
3. 3
< 0. 05
2
Maternal psychological adjustment
0. 124
0. 037
0. 288
3. 3
< 0. 05
3
Maternal preparation for parenting
2. 330
0. 469
0. 075
4. 959
< 0. 05
4
Child poise
0. 144
0. 044
0. 022
1. 2
NS
5
Constant
35. 121
3. 915
000
Table 2 shows concerning independent variable the general regression weight (B), the same old Error Estimate (SEB), the actual body Beta, the T-ratio, the fact that level at which primary spots T-ratio, and the level that the T-ratio is weighty. As indicated in even an table, the T-ratio distinct four variables (social assist to, maternal psychological adjustment and work out maternal preparation for parenting) are going to be significant at 0. 05 top dog level. The contribution of little one's temperament can escalate threat and violence with a prediction of safe being a mother among adolescents of reproductive age. The degree of contribution of the many variables in order of concern merit are: maternal ready for parenting (B=2. 330; t=4. 959; p< 0. 05); social supports (B = 0. 110; t = 3. 3; P< 0. 05); maternal psychological adjustment (B = 0. 124; t equals 3. 3; p< 0. 05); where as child temperament (B = 0. 144; t equals 1. 2; p> 0. 05).
Table 3: X2 Summary on Adolescent Childbearing Contributors and Safe Motherhood.
Variable Description
X2 Cal
Df
X2 tab
Sig (2 tailed)
1
Social support
16. 986
3
7. 81
0. 001
2
Maternal mental adjustment
29. 762
3
7. 01
0. 000
3
Maternal organizing for parenting
33. 956
3
7. 81
0. 000
4
Child disposition
5. 969
3
7. 81
0. 113
* Enthusiastic about at 0. 05 alpha level
The effects on table 3 shows that every one of the independent variables made significant contribution upon prediction on safe maternity at 0. 05 alpha level. This implies that there is a strong relationship between those factors and safe motherhood. The contributions of every one of the variables shows that mother's preparation for parenting (X2 equals 33. 956) has the most potent variable followed while maternal psychological adjustment, (X2 = 29. 762); social assists in (X2 = 16. 986); and one child temperament (X2 equals 5. 969) in this particular order.
Discussion of the Findings
Main goal of this study was to discover the influence of young person childbearing factors as determinants including safe motherhood.
It''s on the above premise that the findings of the gives investigation is reported. The effect on Table 1 established that adolescent childbearing factors one collectively or relatively foresee safe motherhood. The joint mix of the four variables granted taken together and regressed against safe motherhood be aware of 30. 1% of buy a variance (R-square = 0. 201). That it statistically significant as corroborated to the analysis of variance reaction 5. 10. This result agree to the findings reported while Bolton (2000); Eure, Lindsay and Graves (2002); Belsky (1980, 1993) and one Azar (2001). This agreement could supported by Wolfe (1987) furthermore to Belksky (1980).
Maternal preparation for parenting was proven to significantly relate to non-toxic motherhood. This result confirms Borkowski and colleagues (1992). The effect obtained in the study also demonstrated that social support was a sexy contributor to the estimate of safe motherhood. This finding holds the report of Bolton (2000); Azar (2001); Belsky (1980, 1993) and one Wolfe (1985, 1987). Maternal psychological adjustment has been significant in this learn about. This finding supports work of Wolfe (1987) and don't Belsky (1980). Child temperament is not found to significantly predicting safe motherhood. This result was however at variance the actual work of Belsky (1980 and will be offering Wolfe (1987).
Conclusion furthermore to Recommendations
Youth childbearing in any society of the earth has been viewed attributable to social and health problem that needs urgent attention of careful citizens. It is of their premise that the following recommendations are supplied:
(i) Government entities of Nigeria should as a matter of urgency adopt a National Adolescent Sexual health Policy.
(ii) Young adults centres be opened to provide information on family planning, reproductive and sexual health, and STIs and their treatment.
References
Azar, N. T. (1991). Models produced by child abuse: A metatheoretical ask. Criminal Justice and Behaviour, 18, 30-46.
Azar, N. T. (2001). Child abuse and unrealistic expectations: Further validation of each parent opinion questionnaire. Journal of each Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 54, 867-868.
Belsky, C. (1980). Child maltreatment: An easy ecological approach. American Psychology, 35, 320-335.
Belsky, C. (1993). Etiology of girl maltreatment: A developmental green analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 114, 413-434.
Bolton, C. G. (2000). ?ormal??violence in his adult child relationship: A diathesis-stress solution to child maltreatment within the household. Family Abuse and Very own Consequences (pp. 61-75). Essex: England Sage Publications.
Connelly, B. O. and Strauss, F. A. (1992). Mother? age and risk for abuse. Child Abuse and Neglect, 16, 709-718. ??
de Lissovey, V. (1973). Child care use of adolescent parents. Children Today, 2, 22-25. ??????
Eure, B. N., Lindsay, M. D. and Graves, W. J. (2002). Risk of adverse pregnancy final results young adolescent in a good inner city hospital. American Log of Obstetrics and Gynecology 186(5): 918-920.
McKenny, DE. C., Kotch, J. FIN. and Broune, D. D. (1991). Correlates of dysfunctional parenting attitudes among low - income adolescent mothers. Journal of each Adolescent Research, 6, 212-234.
Schellenbach, B. J., Whitman, T. J. and Borkowski, J. D. (1992). Towards an integrative make of adolescent parenting. Human Development, 35, 81-99.
Wolfe, D. A. (1985). Child-abuse grown ups: An empirical review less irritating analysis. Psychological Review, 97, 463-482.
Wolfe, D. A. (1987). Child consequence: Implication for Child Development that will create psychopathology (Vol. 10). Newbury Park, C. A.: Sage Journal.
??
.
No comments:
Post a Comment