As much as I cannot stand soon there will be a parent making young people and throwing them out to make the world with no guidance I must say, I have a "fence straddling" issue I have to bring forth. On one side you have the "good parent" so to talk or the main caretaker giving for the child/children 51% or up-to-date time. They go and seize state assistance (in quite a lot cases) and then finish it off with getting child through child enforcement. I understand that children are expensive, KEEP IN MIND THAT. But, there has as the boundary these "good parents" can't cross. In most suggestions, you have the mother treatment of the child and the father seeing them every other way around weekend. That equals 8 days durring an average month. She then goes and gets the products called child that is intended to care for the children and i can probably almost put days on it that 75% or higher doesn't get spent on what kids. But she are going to pay him no slack. Pondering it as a "defense" or even "comeback" for whatever took place their "baby making state" ( like I discussed IN MOST CASES) Within the, she actually voices publicly that your child was spent opposite rent and electric anf the water etc...
Well, that's the spot where my problem lies........ I believe child should be utilised by the things for the small child solely. Like, school matter trips, daycare expenses (considering he only has them 4 days in a blue moon, this is understandable). Clothing if the mother packs a bag in the weekends, food... SURE.. if you can not already get the countrie for Food Stamp opportunities, doctor co-pay visits(if they could be recycled on a government well being plan). Which IS child then one way for the mother to relieve her money on "non necessities"!!! I may seem bitchy and ignorant with all the issue but I've come across this in SO POSSIBLE SO SO SO A wide range of cases. So, if the "bad parent" sees your son or daughter every other weekend, I believe child is very understandable whether its a reasonable amount as well as. The child is handled different manner. Like daycare expenses come directly coming from a child before its gets if your "mothers" hands. That will be MAGNIFICENT. Just like it comes down right out of his / her check before it moves the "fathers" hands. These child "debit cards" are over used by the Automated teller machines and that cash heads to the the bar or all of your mall. Not in all cases and its particular sad. But, I KNOW THIS OCCURS for a fact come across a way big percentage of the public. Or, the "good parent" just adopted a big fat child payment and calls in for 3 days uninterruptedly at her little rink dink part time job she works to keep up her state assistance cause even the state of MISSOURI will give you less in case the completely unemployed. Or they enroll in education and take 6 times to graduate cause new york state assistance sky rockets if they are a "student" and they can indeed be getting the remainders with their "Federal grants"! Real heated! I see right in this area! YOU LAID DOWN AND STILL NOT OPENED THEM LEGS LITTLE GIRL.... TIME TO STAND UP AND A WOMEN! Take responsibility for actions. I do agree child is needed in so many cases but its being it is related to the wrong things and being taken advantage of. Man and women were of course equal now. Were both able to take care of our children!!! Neither one should be benefited from! I could keep going but Need to explain my other pieces of information! I'm pretty sure your picking up quite possibly putting down.
Now, on you should which I will so gracefully speak about is the "bad parent" that NEVER coming to the kids. These are the mother and father that should pay young lady. Still, only the reasonable amount it will take to raise a young lady. For instance, half the daycare expenses result in wouldn't allow that consider more then 51% to your custody(hopefully), half clothes expenses, half co-pays for the expenses, half the food your son or daughter eats ( its not that mans responsibility to feed friend (or her boyfriend)).
I just believe a mother or father that is the main caretaker should be the main caretaker and quit making everyone else pay for her. The infant, yes 50% of your children.. YES!!!! Why more? 50% of these child is the been unable to parents responsibility.. Not a bit more! And definitely the bad parent just is not responsible for caring by the good parent. You (the so often called "good parent") have your own parents to look after you.
Thirdly, the great parent satisfies their ass off to maintain their family at home And their "child " bill. They see their children 50% or more. Increases their clothes, transports he or she, takes them to school and back 50% of times, feeds them with reduce your help, takes them around the doctor and/or hospital much more their care, Pays to all extra expenses when your children are in their challenge. Then, SURPRISE... He gets a a couple of digit "child " bill the reduced barely survive and deal with when paying this. They pay this significant amount and turns around but in addition spend their last $30. 00 at the local drugstore to feed the kids they have for the next 5-6 days in a row if child receiver is garage their ass off at the store and spending the money on their "debt" and no less bar. Some have seemed using the ATM or debit card machine at the bar planning cards. I have decided by this, friends of mine uncovered this. Then, when this parent gives everything they have includes way off course to achieve the kids and take these school 50% of times, they see their kids donning rags and slippers. I seen this working on a daycare facility and i just felt so dangerous to that parent that is the very active member in this society and pays their taxes to own other "advantage taker" MORE benefits that they are losing! THE POOR KIDS. The children grow up in that environment and think it is "OK" to be in this. Then to top them back.... They go to spend some kids to daycare and they all school hasn't been paid so that cant drop them in all. Well, he spent all of the his money at the food market and doesn't have ample gas money to barely reach work and now he has to miss a day of training cause the kids cant stop by daycare. TOPPING ON THE CAKE!!
And that ladies and gentlemen is a touch deadbeat parent. Whether it is just a man or a females, MAKES NO DIFFERENCE. Children are a 50/50 responsibility that's why should remain that way people balls or not. No man should pay/lose portion of that child and merely women should pay/lose 1 / 2 of that child. Women are clearly able to be the breadwinner and so can be men. Were no varied!!! Child should be with different 50/50 ratio. Sorry if I sound confusing but the truth is guys are my friends and know that i am perfectly capable of manage my children. To watch people utilise is CRAZINESS!!! Just stand up and place your big girl/boy pants on and GO ON! Quit seeking pity. That you that much A reduced a parent!!
.
No comments:
Post a Comment