Family Court unjustly maintain a pool of 'greater good' excuse of 'best interest associated with child' to override constitutional justice and protections of overwhelmingly fathers. Its setup and call time greater good 'abuse' warrant, too, shows it has no public attention towards protecting a father's rights however for deny him his small children and extort his earnings for excellent interest of the aunt.
Securing our unalienable (aka constitutional) legal rights - including parental the best one, right to property and straightforward earnings, life, and search for happiness - is the reason the U. S. was formed. You can't be refused any constitutional right till you're clearly proven liable for committing a serious wrong, or unfit in the illness of parental rights. And supplies, upholding the constitutional rights a person cannot ever be dependent denying those of another where no real wrong is done.
There 's no 'greater good' than our constitutional rights with the protections. 'Greater good' excuses are what tyrannies seemed to justify denying fundamental legal rights to some or all of their citizens.
It's our constitutional the law and protections that legal courts - all courts - are purposed to guard while adjudicating cases. Any court that refuses a litigant's constitutional rights without any subsequent required constitutional due process and fairness by invoking a 'greater good' authorized excuse commits treason you need to tyrannizes that litigant.
The demographic court, now a perverse distortion of that original form, daily denies not alone constitutional rights of claimants - overwhelmingly father - however, the key very processes and fairness that the potential risk of such denials necessarily mandates. It does so and by invoking the 'best interest staying child' excuse without would i need proving the unfitness ones father. And, it accepts the safety of women 'abuse' justification from mothers to deny overwhelmingly fathers excessive rights without the required due process.
*Family court purview and setup things its treasonous actions:
Women overwhelmingly file family or paternity complaints however , privileges family court provides them. The family court dissolves wedding while determining:
1. which parent shall are in physical and legal custody of that child(ren) - which relates to denying the parental rights of merely one parent - overwhelmingly the daddy,
2. how much child the noncustodial parent pay to the custodial adult movie - which extorts major noncustodial father's property . his earnings - underneath the euphemism of 'child ' for no matter what the mother wishes to use it for.
3. the division of assets between the set of - an appropriation of property inspite of wrong done,
4. all the time alimony one parent have to pay the other - higher appropriation of property
Paternity actions determine only first two above . i. e. custody and child issues.
The court's judgment on these things issues requires no wrong committed from parent, nor unfitness quality. In fact the court speakers are characterized by:
* No jury trial particularly the judge serves as mutually judge and jury
* No evidence of wrong or unfitness should also be proved. Insinuations by expectant mum about the father are enough for the judge. Perjury virtually never punished nor accepted for prosecution whenever evident in family litigation cases.
* There's no supposition of equal rights for parents since they'll be awarded inequivalent rights the wrong proven
* There's no presumption of equally sharing parenting of the children when no poisonous nor unfitness is proven
* Actor parent, overwhelmingly the pregnant woman, will be the custodial mom having both legal and physical custody to your child
* The other parent, overwhelmingly the father, is a noncustodial parent having no physical custody of child and seriously without the benefit of most all his showing rights. If he says legal custody, his input will largely be ignored by a legal court.
* The noncustodial mother or father, having been denied the legal right to parent and to together his child, will are reinforced by the significant fraction (30% as a substitute more) of his gross income - or even any sort of imputed (i. e. judge-made up) income ; extorted from him with the threat of jail to pay read the euphemistically called child for pretty much 23 years. Child does not need to be used to the newborn.
* The father - regardless of 'fit' - will overwhelmingly be targeted as you move the noncustodial parent.
* Noncustodial parents are reduced to occasional visitors mostly, and clear enforcement of the particular meager 'privilege' is no longer safeguarded by the trial period.
* If the father cannot pay the extorted 'child no ordered, he is sent to jail for approximately one 6 months at a time without the due process need to so drastically deny rights to somewhat of a person.
* If shiny owes 'child ', new york state will deny his state-required licenses for, and his right to be able to and passport is denied - all as the result of an arrearage.
* Federal laws seem to have been passed that prohibits completed 'child ' obligations ever for forgiven - however illegal.
The family court imposes these items constitutional rights-denying judgments without the presense of required substantive due process and without research to the maxims on the way to law which promote fairness in the court processes to litigants. Like the 'greater good' pardon of 'best interest one's child' illegally since single parents are fit - except in cases where clearly proven otherwise. When, they invoke the 'greater good' maltreatment excuse, too. And, in conclusion, they overwhelmingly target fathers as recipients from the injustice and persecution.
Family in the court judges hide behind feminist-instigated, supported and maintained 'greater good' explanations that deny constitutional pillow top for fathers and men simply benefits and privileges they afford women. That's mistakenly - constitutionally wrong. These judges constitute the lynchpin where this anti-father tyranny turns. And their judgments folks deny fathers' constitutional rights have spawned an enormous and growing state-enforced divorce or separation and domestic violence change. It profits from the extortion of fathers they will euphemistic child orders, lawyers as well fees litigants must sales, and of course tax money from the public under entire body phony 'safety of women' regulations processes formulated under VAWA (Violence In opposition of Women Act). This notable industry's propaganda is self-serving and phony.
Feminist-instigated and supported more achieable good excuses drive fit fathers out from their families and pour and enslave them to aid their earnings for the benefit and privileges of ladies. This tyranny against fathers truly must be exposed for its difficulties for fathers, their children, liberation and family.
.
No comments:
Post a Comment